Saturday, December 29, 2007





WELCOME BACK RICK!

Ok, I know about his past transgressions. Yes he's been know to be sketch. Good thing I'm an optimist.

I am truly happy bordering excited about the hire. He truly loves our alma mater and I'm sure he still can coach. As long as he keeps his nose clean, guns for an NC and beats suc then Athletic Director Dan Guerrero will have been exonerated. That alone is ridiculous 'cause Rick hasn't done crap and the vitriol is spewing.

I love his love for UCLA. Coach Ben Howland has it (and he didn't even go there!) and our football coach has it. Not that it's a pre-req but it helps to have that passion. Here is my favorite quote, "There is no one out there who can give a better campus tour than I." I know exactly what he means and how he feels. Ask anyone who's had the pleasure of being in Westwood with me. I give an awesome tour 'cause I LOVE my alma mater. I can't wait to teach there.

Welcome home Rick. Good luck and God speed.

Friday, December 28, 2007

Do We Even Want To Know How To Think?

I've been reading Ray Bradbury's classic "Fahrenheit 451" and I'm in awe. He has put into story what I've been thinking and feeling the past three plus years. I am half way through but I am excited to share this book with others and try to fascilitate some discussion. It's one thing to have an epiphany but it's more to put legs to it. Anyone in?

The Death of Hope?


Reaction to former PM Benazir Bhutto's assassination.


Images like this always remind me that people still care about the important stuff in life.

Kind of off topic: should we as the U.S. step in and play a role? I personally don't think we should. I believe we are to take an interest but our track history of instilling government regimes has not been too stellar. We should take an advisory/consulting role with whomever is pro-democracy and show them how to do it. Other than that we should not determine who goes into office. It's not like we're God...

Monday, December 17, 2007

I Think Like Ray Bradbury?

Me: "Religion is not the opium for the masses. Entertainment is."

Goth Dane: "Ah, Ray Bradury."

Really I've only heard of his books (most notable being "Fahrenheit 451") but know very little about the man.

What's the point of this blog? Just wanted to say I'm on the same page as Ray Bradury. I'm cool.

Wednesday, December 12, 2007

World Changers/History Makers

Where are the Christians that want to change the world? I don't want the ones that will create an alternate earth where Christians can run around sheltered from the evils of this world. How about the ones who want to change culture as we know it? I want to see journalism, politics, academia, business, etc. change. I want to see our culture change and we have to use the major vehicles of society to facility this change.

It takes men and women with an intimate relationship with God, wisdom, disciplined, love of people and love for their land. An understanding of culture and a vision of how to change it. It's late and I can't think straight. I WANT TO SEE MY CULTURE AND NATION CHANGED!!!!!!

The "Real" Me

I always wonder how people perceive me. It's been brought to my attention after sharing my music video (it's on youtube) that people didn't realize I had a different side to me. Thing is what is that different from? I'm oblivious 'cause I know who I am but I never realized that certain people see certain sides of me. Others see other sides. Now, if others can only see certain sides of me then am I only seeing "certain" sides of my friends? What am I missing?

Monday, December 10, 2007

Laws & Enlightenment

There has always been debate as how to follow the laws of the land. Do we follow by the letter or the spirit?

Not so simple. I think as a nation we follow it by the spirit. Thing is most citizens have no idea what the Constitution nor its amendments say about our laws. Even state laws are not well known and have not been updated in decades! Hell, there are tons of laws that are so archaic they're hilarious (i.e. numerous beach cities in southern California have laws prohibiting the exposure of navels.) But when there is a law that is controversial and/or affects millions of lives people will sit up and take note. How they determine if this law should or should not be passed is its mettle against the Constitution.

Numerous debates and arguments rage on about how to interpret laws in regards to the Constitution. This document is centuries old and is considered the absolute truth for our country's principles. People argue on how our founding fathers would view our laws and societies. It's funny 'cause this is the same perspective we as Christians take when reading the Bible. With the Bible I believe it to be the infalliable word of God. It is THE gold standard. If I have any questions or problems that need resolving I go to God and to His word for the wisdom and clarity I need. For many the same could be said of the Constitution. They see it as near infalliable and that our country's forefathers were completely correct in what they believed and envisioned for this country. Because of that we must go back to the bedrock of democracy (republic if you want to split hairs, but it doesn't sound as cool) and measure it up. If the issue in question adheres to the Constitution then it's viable. If not then it must be disregarded.

I'm rambling a bit but am I off on this?